Extra Office Hours for Midterm 1
Friday 1/28 4pm-6pm
Skip to Solutions

An Inverse Square Vector Field (e.g. Gravity).
My goal is to try to get you to get a feel for all this stuff, so that
you don't feel like you're just pushing around symbols. Vector calculus
has a somewhat undeserved reputation for being "hard." I'm not entirely
sure how it gets this reputation, but I suspect it has to do with the
intimidating nature of the new notations one encounters such as
multiple integrals (actually the integral sign is one of my favorites;
I've always been fond of cool notation), and that it involves 3-D stuff
which is harder to visualize. While it's useful to have the ability to
actually visualize these abstract 3-D objects and rotate them in their
heads and so forth, it's not absolutely necessary to do well in this
course. Also it is a skill you can develop; just because you can't do
it now doesn't mean you can't do it ever. Getting an intuitive idea of
this stuff is not necessarily the same as having elite visualization
skills (iREET ViSu@|_][Z4ti0n SkiLLz). After all, some of these things
generalize to n-dimensional
space for n > 3, in which
these things are impossible to visualize. Yet people get along fine
using n-dimensional calculus
in daily life.
Solutions are in .pdf form. If you use Mac OS X, the included Preview application will view these files automatically after downloading. For other platforms you need Adobe Acrobat Reader, obtainable by clicking the cute image below.

Homework 1, due 1/13/05. Solution.
Homework 2, due 1/13/05.
Solutions updated (1/27/05 11pm). Graphs are easier to see.
Graphics Intensive Solution (300K, dialup users beware).
Even Problems Only, with fewer graphics
(63K)
Homework 3, due 1/20/05
Solutions updated (1/29/05 9pm). Please re-download, since even though I updated, my web-editing software made a copy and kept uploading the old solution anyway. Annoying, I know.
Solution (122K)
Homework 4, due 1/27/05
Complete Solution. (472K) (Updated 9pm 1/30/05) Graphics intensive and includes several pretty plots of vector fields.. It is 13 pages long, beware. I heard ye wail for solutions, well solutions ye get, till they come out your nostrils! =)
Here's an important and hopefully-helpful-for-midterm conceptual discussion on why gradient fields can't have curl. It basically explains a few nagging questions one gets from looking at various "exam prep" questions (268K pdf file)
Last but not least. Good luck on the exam! I'll see you there tomorrow.
Comments about the midterm (2/1/05)
I've finished grading the midterms. The scores were relatively high (mean 86, median 88), and so I was generally happy. Recall that there is a guarantee that "the curve" will not work against you, that is, the score required to get an A, B, C, etc. is guaranteed not to go higher than 90, 80, 70, etc. respectively. So please do not stress out over this. One thing, however, that almost everybody missed 6c, the question on whether the vector field F is the gradient of some scalar field, despite the fact that almost everybody computed the curl correctly in part 6b, to be nonzero (ironically, one person incorrectly computated of a curl to be zero, and also "missed" 6c by answering yes, for the correct reason, and hence got full credit for that part for consistency!). I believe this is because of the wording about "continuous partials" etc. that may have thrown people off to think that it was a question for general F. But still, to be the gradient of something, besides having continuous partials, it also must have curl zero. This is the point of what I explained this in great detail here (and some would say, too much detail!) but I am afraid that it has reached only a very small audience.
Finally a general homework-related issue that was brought up in a conversation: another TA I know asked his section "How long do you spend on a homework problem before you give up on it?" "Raise your hand if it's less than 5 minutes?" Most people raised their hands. This is amazing, since, people are usually afraid to admit even the most innocuous things; getting people to raise their hands in class is far more taxing than calculating the homology of RP2 with coefficients in Z. People are quite proud of their impatience, it seems ("The boy has no patience. I cannot train him." -- Yoda). Now I'm not trying to imply you are impatient, but rather to let you know that if you seek to learn anything in life you have got to have more patience than that.
The midterm will be returned along with uncollected homework next week in section.
Homework 5, due 2/3/05
Partial Solution (Updated 11pm 2/14/05).
Midterm Prep (Updated 6:15 pm, 2/27/05)
Here I have something that will help people to try to see what is going on. There are so many weird concepts and a mishmash of different techniques that it is easy to get lost. There are some illustrative problems in it.. Focus on the "easier to evaluate" problems and please do not tear your hair out in frustration over the hard-to-evaluate ones because it is more important that you get the concept of setting these things up than actually evaluating the things. On the midterm, the integrals should be easy to compute; otherwise you will likely get a "set up but do not evaluate" problem on the midterm. Even if not, I'm the one grading it, so, if some hard-to-evaluate problem comes up, you have my assurance that you will receive the bulk of the points for setup.
Midterm Prep (complete)
Also please go to the professor's web site for the class (link at top) as he has answers for the exam prep sheet up.