next up previous
Next: Conditioning on Up: Corollaries of Kac's Moment Previous: Discrete Time Analogs

The General Product Moment Formula

  Returning to the set-up of Kac's moment formula, or, more generally, the setting of Subsection (3.1), by iterated application of the occupation measure identity there is the following generalization of (22) and (4) to a product of n additive functionals tex2html_wrap_inline3404 , tex2html_wrap_inline3406 :

  equation1916

where the sum extends over all permutations tex2html_wrap_inline3408 of tex2html_wrap_inline3410 . Theorem 5.2 of Dynkin [19] is this result in a slightly different framework. Dynkin assumes a symmetric potential density g(x,y), but (27) applies nonetheless without such symmetry, and without assuming the existence of a potential density provided (21) is valid. Dynkin has shown how in the symmetric case the moment formula (27) underlies a far-reaching isomorphism between the distribution of functionals of the occupation field of a symmetric Markov process, and the distribution of the square of a Gaussian field with covariance derived from the positive definite kernel g(x,y). See [17, 20, 43, 42, 41, 45] for further developments, and Rogers and Williams [57] I.27 for an elementary proof of Dynkin's isomorphism formula for a Markov chain, which is closely related to the discussion in Section 5 below.

Question. Is there any interesting connection between the occupation field of a Markov process that is not necessarily symmetric and the Gaussian process with covariance structure defined by the non-negative definite function (24)? It seems not, since it is not this positive kernel but the one derived more directly from g(x,y) that works in the symmetric case.



Patrick Fitzsimmons
Wed May 17 08:50:36 PDT 2000