2025/2026 SEMINARS

FALL

WINTER

SPRING

Math 208 - Algebraic Geometry

Oprea, Dragos

Oprea, Dragos

Oprea, Dragos

Math 209 - Number Theory

Bucur, Alina

Bucur, Alina

Bucur, Alina

Math 211A - Algebra

Golsefidy, Alireza

Golsefidy, Alireza

Golsefidy, Alireza

Math 211B - Group Actions

Frisch, Joshua

Frisch, Joshua

Frisch, Joshua

Math 218 - Biological Systems

Miller, Pearson

Miller, Pearson

Miller, Pearson

Math 243 - Functional Analysis

Ganesan, Priyanga & Vigdorovich, Itamar

Ganesan, Priyanga & Vigdorovich, Itamar

Vigdorovich, Itamar

Math 248 - Real Analysis

Bejenaru, Ioan

Bejenaru, Ioan

Bejenaru, Ioan

Math 258 - Differential Geometry

Spolaor, Luca

Spolaor, Luca

Spolaor, Luca

Math 268 - Logic

TBD

TBD

TBD

Math 269 - Combinatorics

Rhoades, Brendon & Warnke, Lutz

Rhoades, Brendon & Warnke, Lutz

Rhoades, Brendon & Warnke, Lutz

Math 278A - CCoM

Cheng, Li-Tien

Cheng, Li-Tien

Cheng, Li-Tien

Math 278B - Math of Info, Data

Cloninger, Alexander

Cloninger, Alexander

Cloninger, Alexander

Math 278C - Optimization

Nie, Jiawang

Nie, Jiawang

Nie, Jiawang

Math 288A - Probability

Peca-Medlin, John

Peca-Medlin, John

Peca-Medlin, John

Math 288B - Statistics

TBD

TBD

TBD

Math 292 - Topology Seminar

Chow, Bennett

Chow, Bennett

Chow, Bennett

Mon, Mar 9 2026
  • 3:00 pm
    Benjamin Baily - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    Classifying extremal pairs in equal characteristic

    Math 211A: Algebra Seminar

    APM 7321

    Let R be a polynomial ring, J ⊆ R an ideal, and m a maximal ideal containing J. We consider invariants of the pair (R, J) which measure the singularities of the embedding Spec(R/J) ⊆ Spec(R) at m: the log canonical threshold (lct) in characteristic zero and the F-pure threshold (fpt) in positive characteristic. A smaller value of the lct/fpt means that the embedding is "more singular;" we seek to classify pairs which are as singular as possible.

    In 1972, Skoda showed that lct_m(R, J) >= 1/ord_m(J), where ord_denotes the order of vanishing at m. Skoda's bound has been generalized and refined many times since; among these improvements is a 2014 result by Demailly and Pham using mixed multiplicities of J and m. We extend Demailly and Pham's lower bound to positive characteristic and study the pairs (R, J) for which lct_m(R, J) (or fpt_m(R, J)) equals the lower bound. We classify these "extremal pairs" in the standard graded case, the codimension 1 case, and the dimension 2 case, confirming special cases of a conjecture by Bivià-Ausina.

Tue, Mar 10 2026
  • 11:00 am
    Hui Tan, Changying Ding - UCLA
    TBA

    Math 243: Functional Analysis Seminar

    APM 6402

  • 11:00 am
    Igor Kukavica - USC
    Exact boundary controllability for the ideal magneto-hydrodynamic equations

    Math 248: Real Analysis Seminar

    We consider the three-dimensional ideal MHD system on a domain in  with a controllable part of the boundary where we prescribe the boundary data. The basic question of boundary controllability is whether, given two states, one can by means of the control on the boundary drive one state to another. We will review the existing literature on this problem and provide a positive result for domains with only Sobolev regularity. The results are based on works with Matthew Novack, Wojciech Ozanski, and Vlad Vicol.
     

Wed, Mar 11 2026
  • 4:00 pm
    Prof. Yang Liu - Lawrence Berkeley Lab
    New Matrix Completion Algorithms for Highly Oscillatory Operators in Seismic and Tomographic Applications

    Math 278C: Optimization and Data Science

    APM 5829 & Zoom (Meeting ID: 926 5846 1639 / Password: 278CWN26)

    Low-rank representation-based matrix or tensor completion algorithms have been developed over the past two decades for various scientific and data-science applications. Given an incomplete data matrix/tensor with missing or noisy entries but certain underlying algebraic structures, completion algorithms rely on optimization techniques to recover the full data matrix/tensor directly in a compressed representation. In the past, various compression formats have been considered such as low-rank matrix format, and Tucker, CP or tensor-train-based tensor formats. Moreover, different optimization algorithms have been exploited including alternating least squares (ALS), alternating direction filtering (ADF), nuclear norm-based optimization, Riemannian optimization and adaptive moment estimation (ADAM). Despite the success of these completion algorithms, they become less effective when dealing with highly oscillatory operators, rising from e.g., large-scale seismic or tomographic applications where physical or cost constraints limit the amount of data acquisition. This is largely due to the incapability of the abovementioned compression formats for representing non-smooth operators. Therefore, a more effective completion algorithm is called for, as the successful completion of the data matrix can significantly improve the quality of downstream algorithm pipelines for these inverse or imaging problems.   

    In this talk, I will present our recent work on new completion algorithms for highly oscillatory operators (arXiv:2510.17734). In a nutshell, we consider a different compression format called butterfly for the incomplete data matrix. Butterfly formats have been proven highly effective for compressing highly oscillatory operators such as Green’s functions for high-frequency wave equations, Fourier integral operators and special function transforms, but haven’t been investigated in the matrix completion context. Our work relies on a tensor reformulation of the butterfly format into a tensor network, and we consider a variety of optimization algorithms including ALS, ADF and ADAM. Numerical results demonstrate that our butterfly completion algorithms can efficiently recover a n×n matrix representing Green’s functions or Radon transforms with only O(nlogn) observed entries in O(nlogn) operation counts. I will also discuss about the limitation and future work regarding our proposed algorithm.


    Biography: Yang Liu is a staff scientist in the Scalable Solvers Group of the Applied Mathematics and Computational Research Division at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, in Berkeley, California. Dr. Liu received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan in 2015. From 2015 to 2017, he worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the Radiation Laboratory, University of Michigan. From 2017 to 2019, he worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. His main research interest is in numerical linear and multi-linear algebras, computational electromagnetics and plasma, scalable machine learning algorithms, and high performance scientific computing. Dr. Liu is the lead developer of the linear solver package ButterflyPACK and autotuning package GPTune, and is a core developer for linear solver packages SuperLU_DIST and STRUMPACK. Dr. Liu is the recipient and co-recipient of the ACES Early Career Award 2025, PDSEC Best Paper Award 2025, AT-AP RASC Young Scientists Award 2022, the APS Sergei A. Schelkunoff Transactions Prize 2018, FEM first place student paper award, 2014, and the ACES second place student paper award, 2012.

Thu, Mar 12 2026
  • 4:00 pm
    Scott Sheffield - MIT
    Yang-Mills and the surprising implications of 1+1=2 and 2+2=4

    2026 Ronald K Getoor Distinguished Lecture

    APM 6402

    In 2000, the Clay Institute offered one million dollars for a mathematical construction of 4D Yang-Mills gauge theory. That problem remains unsolved, but there has been spectacular progress in recent years on many related 2D and 4D problems.

    It all starts with 1+1=2. The fact that 1+1=2 implies that two non-parallel lines in the plane (co-dimension 1) meet at a point (co-dimension 2). Less trivially, any two paths through a square (one top to bottom, one left to right) intersect somewhere. Similarly, 2+2=4 implies that two fully-non-parallel 2D planes in 4D meet at a point (interpret one dimension as time and imagine moving lines in 3D colliding like light sabers) and that knotted loops in 3D cannot be disentangled without tearing rope.

    Further implications include the self-duality of 1-forms (in 2D) and 2-forms (in 4D), the conformal invariance of special Gaussian fields in 2D and 4D, and the self-duality of cellular spanning trees, along with other fundamental results about random curves and surfaces, spin systems and connections. How will this help with our remaining open problems?

Fri, Mar 13 2026
  • 11:00 am
    TBD
    TBD

    Math 278B: Mathematics of Information, Data, and Signals

    APM 6402

Thu, Mar 19 2026
  • 9:00 am
    Sutanay Bhattacharya
    Coinvariants in Superspace

    Advancement to Candidacy

    APM 6402

    The rank $n$ superspace $\Omega_n$ is the algebra of polynomial-valued differential forms on affine $n$-space. This carries an $G$-action for any pseudo-reflection group $G$ -- two important examples being the symmetric group $\mathfrak S_n$ and the hyperoctahedral group $\mathfrak B_n$. The superspace coinvariant ring for $G$, defined as the quotient of $\Omega_n$ cut out by $G$-invariants of $\Omega_n$ with vanishing constant term, has received increased attention in recent years. In this talk, we explore some recent results on the superspace coinvariant rings for $\mathfrak S_n$ and $\mathfrak B_n$, including their Hilbert series, explicit monomial bases, and their representation-theoretic structures.